To Ward 1 Friends & Voters

EDITED TO ADD: A preface – this is a little harsh. I am sure Paul Chandler is a great guy and sincere in his efforts. But the narrative around this election is frustrating, because it elevates Chandler to the symbol of a new New Haven politics. This, to me, is almost offensive to the sincere and sustained commitment Alder Eidelson has shown this city — and, equally importantly, obscures the artificial nature of Chandler’s campaign. Paul Chandler was in the right place at the right time, which is great, but Eidelson has been here all along. It’s unfortunate a happy coincidence could decide tomorrow’s election.

I don’t live in NHV’s Ward 1, but you might have heard I’m pretty passionate about tomorrow’s aldermanic election. Not sure who to vote for tomorrow? Here are a couple of reasons you should support Democratic incumbent Sarah Eidelson.

The Chandler campaign relies on the fundamentally dishonest image it projects. Chandler’s columns and press materials emphasize his connection with New Haven and the passion for good governance that pushed him to run. This is a great story, but belies a few key facts: after a lengthy interview process, Chandler was chosen (from a pool of ~6 candidates) by the Yale College Republicans, who picked him specifically because of his supposed bipartisan appeal. The bipartisan “grassroots effort” Chandler and his supporters extol is nothing but carefully calculated partisan AstroTurf — Chandler extols bipartisanship and being an “independent” voice but he would not be running were it not for Republican students on campus. Maybe that’s why I’ve seen Chandler walk out of on-campus recruiting interviews at UCS; so much for his commitment to New Haven. (Especially edited again to add that I don’t think my earlier criticism of PC re: on-campus recruiting was fair. My criticism here stems from my belief that someone motivated enough to run for alderman in New Haven should be willing to stay in New Haven regardless of the outcome of that election, and support New Haven politics, development, activism, etc. I can’t know what Chandler was doing in UCS, so the assumption I was making about his intent is unfair. That said, I would love to know if Chandler has made any statement about his post-grad plans if he doesn’t win (I can’t recall one), like Sarah’s commitment to stay in New Haven win-lose two years ago year. That said, I am keeping my original comment in, because I wrote it originally and wouldn’t want hide my tracks dishonestly.)

Not so bad? Sure, I’ll grant a man the right to hedge his bets. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. The Chandler campaign utterly lacks professionalism. Campaign reps lied about receiving an endorsement from Senator Rob Portman, then lied about today’s endorsement in the Yale Daily News. On the night of the primary, Chandler and his campaign representatives literally randomly walked uninvited into the Yale Daily News building so that they could be sure to be quoted in the paper, as though this is somehow the best and most appropriate way to interface with the press as a political candidate.

I love surprises, but this is just unprofessional. This isn’t a game. If the Chandler team can’t run a serious campaign, how can we expect Paul Chandler to interface with the board of aldermen? This is especially important, since Chandler will be representing Yale students. We need an alderman who defies the bad reputation Yalies get, not reinforces it.

Chandler’s campaign is riddled with contradictions. He’s an Independent, but he’s excited to become the Republican minority leader on the board of aldermen: the face of a political party he attempts to distance himself from.

More importantly, Chandler has been to few (if any?) board of aldermen meeting. He justifies this by saying most of the dialogue goes on behind the scenes. This justification, in turn, contradicts his main criticism of Sarah Eidelson: that she hasn’t spoken at these meetings! If most of the dialogue goes on behind the scenes, why does it matter if Sarah speaks/does not speak at the meetings themselves?

Chandler’s platform is ridiculous. The board of alderman has little purview over education reform, his pet project, and his plans to make the New Haven Green “more accessible” are ridiculous: it is LITERALLY RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM YALE. IT IS LITERALLY THE DISTANCE FROM CALHOUN TO DURFEE’S, where, coincidentally, there is also not a crosswalk — but not like you’ve noticed, because it’s super accessible already!

Paul’s platform focuses on making things better for people in Ward 1, but Sarah’s policies elevate New Haven’s neediest, creating spillover effects that make us all better in the process. I haven’t always supported her on campus, but a vote for her opponent, Paul Chandler, is a catastrophic step back. We all deserve better.

About these ads

7 thoughts on “To Ward 1 Friends & Voters

  1. Okay honey, you are sounding a little desperate. I don’t know why you are making it your duty to bash on the Chandler campaign.

    I don’t think that Paul wanting to be an independent voice and him being a Republican are contradictory, given the context. The board of aldermen has well over half of its members back by unions. When Paul says he wants to be an independent voice, I’m pretty sure he means independent from unions and other special interests. In addition, Paul gave his reasons for being Republican at the debate. He said it was more honest to who he is, and you can’t argue that because I’m sure you don’t know him very well. I personally don’t think he is very Republican but I wouldn’t argue against his conviction to label himself as Republican.

    All of your reasons to vote for Sarah have to do with why you don’t like the Chandler campaign. Why don’t your reasons have to do with the good Sarah has done and how accessible she is to the student body and how she’s no backed by unions and how she wants to be a voice for ALL who live in ward one? Wait, I know why, none of it would be true.

    It’s very encouraging to see a young person, such as yourself take interest in local politics, because far too many youth are apathetic, so I commend you, but at the same time, be more respectful and inform yourself better.

    • Hi Juliet — thanks for your interesting comment.

      The point about Chandler and unions is important, and I’m glad you raised it. I agree Eidelson is more entangled with unions than perhaps is best for the city. That said, even if Chandler is not beholden to union interests, that doesn’t mean he’s independent — he collaborates closely with conservative / independent voices in city politics, and stands up for those special interests. So I’m left weighing which interest group I think will lead to the best outcomes; others might disagree.

      I don’t criticize Paul Chandler’s decision to label himself a Republican, but I object to the campaign’s attempt to have its cake and eat it to: to distance itself from Republican politics while relying on a machine of Republican and conservative support on campus.

      “Why don’t your reasons have to do with the good Sarah has done and how accessible she is to the student body and how she’s no backed by unions and how she wants to be a voice for ALL who live in ward one?” A simple answer: I think Paul Chandler will be actively bad for Ward 1 and NHV. I agree Eidelson needs to be more visible in the ward and responsive to communication. But I don’t think she’ll make things worse.

      • And Republicans, conservatives, and Independents on Yale’s campus couldn’t possibly support a voice on the Board of Aldermen even if it means that he isn’t lock in step with their other beliefs about politics? How is it disingenuous for them to support him? Obviously he’s far preferable to Eidelson from their perspective. What politician would turn away that kind of support? You’re smart enough to realize that none would, and that there is no *real* contradiction there, which makes me think that you’re deliberately distorting your understanding of campus politics to cast a bad light on the Chandler campaign. I agree with Juliet, this post comes across as a little desperate. It seems like it’s only purpose is to take down a campaign with which you have your own personal issues.

  2. I actually met Paul at an interview at UCS.

    Guess what? It was for a job in a Connecticut town not far from New Haven.

    Aldermen need jobs too – unless, of course, they have a ready-made union post waiting for them…

    • Great point, PL. I made those initial comments angrily, and you’ll see I retracted the comments in the post. You’re absolutely right that they’re unfair to Chandler, and I was wrong to make them. That said, I’d still love to hear the same commitment to stay in New Haven from him that voters got from Eidelson two years ago, or have that publicized more greatly.

  3. Doesn’t Sarah Eidelson live in Brooklyn for several days every week? The Chandler campaign hasn’t even brought that up. To you, that’s not worth mentioning but Paul’s interview at UCS for a New Haven-based job was?

    • I think I made it pretty clear that I regret typing those words about Paul. I’d be happy to retract them, but I think it’s important to remain transparent about one’s evolution of thought and honest about one’s mistakes. I’m not familiar with Sarah’s living situation; if that’s true, it’s certainly problematic! The Chandler campaign should have mentioned this in its press materials.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s